Search for: "Bowers v. Bowers" Results 61 - 80 of 621
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bower states: “As such, the issue is not whether the settlement was adequate or reasonable, a fair amount or not, but simply whether the client’s assent was properly obtained. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Thomas Rid and Brandon Van Grack to discuss the Justice Department indictment of Russian national Aleksandr Ionov: Scott Roehm argued that Biden administration officials need to reject the use of evidence obtained by torture in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Texas, the Court struck down a Texas law that made it a crime for gays and lesbians to have consensual sex in the privacy of their homes, overturning Bowers v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am by Josh Blackman
The central holding of Bowers has been brought in question by this case, and it should be addressed. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am by Ambassador P. Michael McKinley (ret.)
Across the country, Republicans who opposed Trump’s efforts to overturn the elections, like Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers, refuse to rule out voting for the former president again in 2024. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Ilya Somin
I think the liberals were right about Bowers and Baker. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Pollard
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm by admin
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 2:28 pm
Author Anthony Appleyard Licence  CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsA Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Zacaroli) Puma SE v Nike Innovate CV [2021] EWHC 1438In Trade Marks - Equisafety v Battle Hayward and Bower 7 Jan 2021 IP Northwest, I discussed Mr Nicholas Caddick QC's judgment in Equisafety Ltd v Battle, Hayward and Bower, Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 3296 (IPEC) (8 Dec 2021) where [read post]