Search for: "Bright v. Bright" Results 61 - 80 of 4,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 8:47 pm by Brian Van Vleck
In Bright v. 99 Cent Only Stores, the Second Appellate District reversed the dismissal of a cashier's claim for penalties because her employer failed to give her a place to sit while she was working. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 5:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Of the matter of --bright-line rule -- cases, it is true that the Supreme Court rejected a bright-line rule proposed by the CAFC in Festo. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
Susan Bandes (Depaul) blogs about the argument at ACSBlog in a post entitled Bright Line Fever: The Argument in Maryland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 10:30 pm
Another "Bright-Line" Rule from the Federal Circuit By Kevin E. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:07 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In the recently published Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores, the California Court of Appeal held that an employee could sue her employer, 99¢ Only Stores, for failure to provide “suitable” seating during her employment. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:27 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently decided an easement dispute involving a nature preserve and a neighboring landowner in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:27 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently decided an easement dispute involving a nature preserve and a neighboring landowner in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
Judge Graber has announced a bright line test. [read post]