Search for: "Brown v. Employment Division" Results 61 - 80 of 313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
Under the circumstances, the court said, “imposing the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience of this Court,” citing Brown v Safir, 258 AD2d 359, [leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 807]. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
Under the circumstances, the court said, “imposing the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience of this Court,” citing Brown v Safir, 258 AD2d 359, [leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 807]. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC v Brown  2021 NY Slip Op 06167  Decided on November 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department is a novel defense to a claim of deceit. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman  (follow me on Twitter) On June 4, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, issued Iskanian v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am by Eric Goldman
This lawsuit involves the @UOEquity Twitter account, operated by the University of Oregon’s Division of Equity and Inclusion. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Turning to DOE’s termination of Teacher’s employment, the Appellate Division, citing Brown v City of New York, 280 AD2d 368, observed that it is well established that a "probationary employee may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that [the] dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law. [read post]