Search for: "Brown v. INCARCERATED PUBLIC DEFENDER" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
. Visit In-House Counsel Going to Court Without Leaving Prison The Connecticut Law Tribune Teleconferencing technology -- so common in corporate America -- is now an option for some incarcerated defendants in Connecticut. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs fearful of public hostility stemming from the nature of their claim Some plaintiffs might think that their claims will appear legally or morally unjustified to the public—even if the claims are themselves legally valid—and could lead to public ridicule or shaming.[6] [d.] [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
Defending the separation of religion and government More must be done, however. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm by John Ross
Suing for their wrongful incarceration, the two receive $100+ mil in damages. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
Now, the defendant, ultimately accepted a plea bargain of life, and you rejected his challenge to the death penalty and found that he'd shown no evidence of discriminatory intent. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm by SO Issues
Simmons (2005), in which the court categorically prohibited the death penalty for defendants who committed their crimes before the age of 18; and Graham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Humane Society of America et al.Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al.Petitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians et al.Petitioner's reply CVSG Information:Invited: January 18, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  Perhaps history teaches us that when public figures take public action through public institutio [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
Martha Coakley, the Democrat and AG of Mass., is suddenly facing stiff competition from Scott Brown, a Republican. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
") After conducting the most thorough judicial review to date of relevant social science on the net public-safety effects of allowing public carriage of guns, Judge Richard Posner in Moore v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]