Search for: "Brown v. Phillips" Results 61 - 80 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on the morning of 5 December 2011 Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear the eight day appeals of the Employer’s Liability Insurance “Trigger” Litigation. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
According to the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Thomas Brown Jr. filed the case styled Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am by royblack
The deep south was not ready to accept public defense for indigent, mainly black defendants, not unlike how it refused to accept Brown v School Board. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 1 February 2012 in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Walker, L Hale, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr and L Dyson) over two days is the appeal of Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
By a majority  (Lords Phillips, Brown and Rodger dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have lawfully been detained in any event did not affect the Secretary of State’s liability in false imprisonment. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Grace Capel
Both Lord Walker [92] and Lord Brown [95] adopted Lord Phillips’ reasoning on this point, although it assumed a much greater significance in their judgments than it d [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Pincus of Mayer Brown in Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 2:25 pm
Grohmann and Katherine Vesely, O'Bryan Brown & Toner, Louisville for Morassutti Sean Ragland, Phillips Parker Orberson & Moore, Louisville for Lowe Richard P. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Finally, Sharon Investments Limited v Mauritius Revenue Authority is to be heard on Thursday 21 July 2011 also by Lord Phillips, Brown, Mance, Wilson and Sir Stephen Sedley. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:25 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714 Justice Gzell of the New South Wales Supreme Court refused to exonerate the former James Hardie directors and executives who contravened section 180(1) Corporations Act in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11)[2009] NSWSC 287 relating to their approving the content of the Draft ASX Announcement at the February 2001 board meeting and related matters. [read post]