Search for: "Burford v. Burford"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
HENRY, Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
The district court granted defendants’ motion, concluding that abstention was appropriate under both the primary jurisdiction doctrine and under Burford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:24 pm
Raritan Baykeeper asks us to go a step further and hold that primary jurisdiction and Burford abstention never apply to RCRA and CWA actions. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
At the same time, the first time I read Goodridge v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
National City Mortgage Company v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Gatti v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:39 pm
" The dissenting Justice said, "I join the majority opinion on several issues, but I cannot agree with the majority's discussion and conclusion regarding abstention under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:15 pm
" The Appeals Court said, "The pendency of these parallel state administrative proceedings led the district court to abstain from hearing the appellants' federal citizen suit, ordering dismissal on the authority of Burford v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Burford v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm
Burford v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Burford v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
Blue Cross also makes the argument that, independent of the state action doctrine, the principles of abstention, set forth in Burford v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
Burford, 848 F.2d 1441, 1453 (9th Cir.1988). [read post]
29 May 2010, 1:12 pm
For example, in Ground Zero Center for Non-Violent Action v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
V. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
Rather, the Second Circuit relied on the abstention doctrine set forth in Burford v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
See Caudill v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:05 pm
See Miedema v. [read post]
