Search for: "Burns v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm
., appellant, was acquitted of two counts of attempted first-degree murder, and convicted of first-degree arson, malicious burning of personal property, malicious destruction of property having a value of more than $500.00, and seven counts ... [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:43 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:41 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:18 pm
Attorney Burns stated: Lawyers often believe they are wise enough and clever enough not to be seduced into conflicting representation. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm
Damages Justice Burns stated that it was ‘’clear that the publication of the ZGeek posts had a detrimental impact on the plaintiff’s wellbeing’’. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
In Carter v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
Jessica Yuan and Dianne Saxe Animal Welfare Institute, et al., v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:37 pm
The case is Burton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:18 am
The latest Ken Burns documentary is on Muhammed Ali. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] Thursday ruled in Bond v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 6:25 pm
One of the landmark cases in product liability, Liebeck v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:11 am
" State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In Haas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm
Blue called in sick today, causing another delay in the case of State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
By Sara Hutchins Jodka In Burns v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:22 am
Matter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 06681, Decided on August 28, 2008, Appellate Division, Third Department In Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562, the Court of Appeals said... [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Which gets called out by Chief Judge Kozinski for (1) doing a bad job, and then (2) trying to get out the consequences of this (alleged) malfeasance by convincing -- successfully, I might add -- three district court judges down here (Judges Burns, Benitez, and Collins) to refuse to accept the unconditional guilty pleas of various criminal defendants.No dice, he holds. [read post]
