Search for: "CAMPAIGN/RESPONSIBLE v. FDA" Results 61 - 80 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 4:21 pm by Joe Consumer
Mensing and Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
This criticism is closely related to similar complaints about the Court’s campaign finance rulings, especially Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
., : COMPLAINT AND DEMAND: FOR JURY TRIALPlaintiff, ::v. :: Case No. 1:14-cv-879AbbVie Inc., and :Abbott Laboratories, Inc., ::Defendants. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  No promotional campaign (off- or on-label) can work for that long if the drug in question doesn’t work. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Eric
Skinner posted the information in response to negative reviews of Ms. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:10 am by David J. DePaolo
Bulk manufacturing of drugs was not allowed under the terms of its Massachusetts license.Additionally, the Massachusetts health department said the New England Compounding Center failed to follow standards to ensure its products were sterile, and distributed two lots of medication before completing sterility testing.According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, compounding pharmacies are regulated by the states in which they operate, with little or no oversight by federal authorities.Legislation… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
GIB broadcasted a public response to the FDA’s warning letter. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
GIB broadcasted a public response to the FDA’s warning letter. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Rost was a Vice President, Marketing and Managing Director for Wyeth, responsible for the Nordic region in Europe.Dr. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Short ad campaign—the product basically failed in the market. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs can respond to claims that modified risk products are unhealthy “if and when the veracity of the health claims they make in response have been demonstrated. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court then gave special attention to plaintiffs’ argument for strict scrutiny, which was that the government was attempting to make commercial speakers into its “mouthpiece” for a “subjective and highly controversial marketing campaign expressing its disapproval of their lawful products. [read post]