Search for: "CHANG v. KAPPOS" Results 61 - 80 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
A 10 or 20 percent difference does not change this conclusion. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 1:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As such, Appellants’ arguments attempting to distinguish thesetting of a 10% value in Langseth from the claimed “value” is unpersuasivebecause the arguments do not address the prima face case of obviousnessestablished by the Examiner’s rejection. from footnote 5: We note that the instant appeal was filedpriorto the Supreme Court’sopinion inBilski v Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3218 (June 28, 2010). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:05 am by Dennis Crouch
Kappos oral arguments are set for this afternoon at the Supreme Court in Washington DC. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:32 pm by Vincent LoTempio
Kappos Decision Bilski vs Kappos Legal community weighs in on Bilski v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Stefanie Levine
Kappos http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-18424.pdf Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Kappos oral arguments are set for this afternoon at the Supreme Court in Washington DC. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:30 am by Gene Quinn
We discuss the commitment to excellence required to stay #1 for twenty years, the process for deciding which patents to keep paying maintenance fees on, what may change once the U.S. converts to first-to-file on March 16, 2013, how Watson is being put to use and the parting of USPTO Director David Kappos. [read post]