Search for: "COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO."
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
The best known example is Coca Cola. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:21 am
” Coca Cola overruled? [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
In M/S Gujarat Bottling Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:00 pm
Coca-Cola Co., No. 12-761, slip op. at 17 (U.S. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:48 am
While observing that it agreed with the district court's determination that the last chance agreement was not unconscionable when initially entered into, the Court concluded that the district court erred by reading the Court's previous decision in Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:52 am
Coca–Cola Co., 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2010), which didn’t consider state law claims that imposed requirements “identical to” FDA requirements. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:21 am
Coca-Cola Open for Co-Branding? [read post]
26 May 2013, 7:59 pm
Hindustan Coca Cola Ltd. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
She started at the bottling company as a junior lawyer in 1992, becoming vice president, secretary and general counsel of Coca-Cola Ltd. in 1997.During her last year at the company, Alzetta-Reali says she became a member of ACC as part of the company’s large law membership. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:08 am
So Coca Cola initiated a contest to identity a unique bottle. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
Pepper-Royal Crown Bottling Co., PepsiCo, Canada Dry Bottling Co. of New York, the Can Manufacturers Institute, 7-Eleven Convenience Stores, and Yum! [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
Pepper-Royal Crown Bottling Co., PepsiCo, Canada Dry Bottling Co. of New York, the Can Manufacturers Institute, 7-Eleven Convenience Stores, and Yum! [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Coca–Cola Co., 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012), wasn’t applicable; that case didn’t rule on preemption of state law claims, only preemption of Lanham Act claims. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Examples: Only thing he thinks registrable is Coca-Cola logo with bottle; not FedEx logo, Yahoo! [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:34 am
The quote is from China Daily: The Coca Cola Co apologized on Friday for the way it has dealt with a scandal that arose after some of its drinks were alleged to be contaminated with chlorine. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
" Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
" Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
Textron cited as an example the Coca-Cola® bottle, noting that the bottle’s significant overall non-functional shape would not lose trademark protection simply because “the shape of an insignificant element of the design, such as the lip of the bottle, is arguably functional. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:58 am
Finally, it states that competitors such as The Coca-Cola Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
In Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and ACE American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
