Search for: "CONSTRUCTION RESOURCES CORP. v. COURTS, LTD." Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
  Title: Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  It is a libel trial that holds the record for the longest trial in UK legal history at 313 days (McDonalds Corp v Steel [2000] 1 WLR 618). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
OG Property Owner Corp., which is developing the 1,600-acre Wilder project just east of the Caldecott Tunnel, has agreed to pay the Regional Water Quality Control Board $530,000 to resolve a 2009 complaint that violated its construction permit and state water regulations including the Clean Water Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
General Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir. 1972) (“bare bones statement. . .without any supporting facts permits dismissal”); Jackson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am by Marx Sterbcow
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), established a two-step test for judicial review of an agency’s construction of a statute it administers. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The California Air Resources Board announced Wednesday that it has penalized Conopco Inc. d/b/a Unilever $1.3 million for illegal consumer sales of AXE Deodorant Bodyspray for Men. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of the role of attorney argument:While attorney argument might be able to clarify an otherwise ambiguous expert declaration in some circumstances, see Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
Sued for infringement, InfoUSA snuffed the spam patent in summary judgment under obviousness after claim construction. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office)   Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP)   Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46)   South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated… [read post]