Search for: "CROMWELL V. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:20 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:55 pm
In both Bowen v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In addition, on December 21, 2022, the New York DFS proposed guidance for New York state-regulated banking and mortgage institutions relating to management of material financial risks from climate change. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit released its opinion in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Public International Law: State ImmunityKazemi Estate v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
For example, all 50 states require reporting of data breaches to affected consumers, and many separately require reporting to state Attorneys General, but in circumstances that vary among the states in terms of the nature of compromised data that triggers notification, the content of the required notice, and the timing in which notice must be provided. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:35 am
Sullivan & Cromwell and Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
”[19]The Interpretive Guidance states that the Council expects to “continue addressing most risks through its collaboration with primary financial regulators” and will base any nonbank financial company designation on “data-driven analysis that reflects the distinctive aspects of the company, its market, and its existing regulation. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Case Information Régie des rentes du Québec v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
In June 2010, in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm
Instead, 1968 marked the first year of an unofficial moratorium on executions in the lead-up to the Supreme Court’s 1972 Furman v Georgia decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
Supreme Court Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 (14 December 2011) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor [2011] UKSC 60 (14 December 2011) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58 (14 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue And Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2011] EWCA Civ 1578 (20 December 2011) Ablyazov & Ors v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1588 (20 December… [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:17 am
Sullivan & Cromwell has filed a new Motion to Dismiss in the case of Charney v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:53 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.) [read post]
