Search for: "Center for Regulatory Reasonableness v. EPA" Results 61 - 80 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Cary Coglianese
Had HollyFrontier posed the same kind of textual question but over EPA’s authority to impose regulatory obligations, would this Court have chosen the option that gave EPA greater discretion? [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler defended the move by stating that the “final rule puts in place a sensible one national program that strikes the right regulatory balance that protects our environment, and sets reasonable targets for the auto industry. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Hannah Pugh
Three limitations restrict EPA’s regulatory authority over CAFOs. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Lawson Fite
Examples of non-discretionary duties that courts will enforce include the Federal Records Act mandate that the National Archivist “shall request the Attorney General to initiate … an action” for redress of record destruction; a statute requiring “timber in an amount … not less than the annual sustained yield capacity … shall be sold annually”; or a regulatory “duty to warn. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule rolling back an Obama-era policy that regulated the treatment of wastewater in coal plants. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
In a report for the Center for Progressive Reform, law professors Thomas O. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 pm by Lisa Heinzerling
” Here, however, Breyer explained, EPA’s interpretation was “neither persuasive nor reasonable,” given the escape hatch it would pry open in the Clean Water Act’s permitting provisions. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:18 am by Dennis Crouch
The Supreme Court has previously concluded in Ruckelshaus v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard W. Parker
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The other two jurors found that the prosecutor had not proved the case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
In 1997 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) set a goal of less than 2.1 cases/100,000 by 2010. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Koni stressed:Since the jury recognized the fact that violence on one side (from the public authorities) did not authorize violence on the other side (from the subjects), the court had every reason to emphasize the first act of violence, to underscore its moral effects. ... [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Joseph DeQuarto
In a court challenge brought by the Southern Environmental Law Center, however, a federal judge struck down the suspension, holding that EPA did not allow a meaningful public comment period. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Robert V. Percival
” In his dissent in White Stallion Energy Center v. [read post]