Search for: "Center v. Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 1,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 10:59 am by Stuart Tubis
But buried deep inside these cases you will find reference to Doran v. 7‐Eleven, 524 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:20 am
So, for example, if I go to the CanLII report of the Johnson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Johnson was not entitled to a statement of the reason for the termination of her probationary employment, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760.Accordingly, said the court, Supreme Court properly granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Johnson’s petition.* See, for example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(b) of the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court issued opinions in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Superior Court of Sacramento County (Center for Investigative Reporting, Real Party in Interest) (justice pro tempore to be assigned)(2) S201116 Berkeley Hillside Preservation et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Illinois and his role in presiding over the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:45 am by Karen E. Keller
(patent infringement) 11/2: Verizon Clinton Center Drive Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
Camille Zeller in the Attorney Conference Center of the Hale Boggs Federal Building at (504)589-7990, or by email at fbano@bellsouth.net. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:05 am
Johnson attempted to explain the discrepancy by suggesting he drove extra miles to keep his truck cabin cool, to avoid extra idling and check fire hydrants or that he made an erroneous log entry.ALJ Casey rejected Johnson’s explanations as unlikely and recommended be suspended without pay for 12 days.* Individuals in New York City only need dial 311 - the 311 Citizens Service Center - for all non-emergency related Government services calls. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Stephanie Zable
The decision followed from the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling Johnson v. [read post]