Search for: "Check v. Mitchell" Results 61 - 80 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of an independent intervening event does not necessarily result in a break in the chain of causation and a finding of no liability: see Jobling v Associated Dairies Ltd, [1981] 2 All ER 752 (HL) [Jobling]; see also Penner v Mitchell (1978), 1978 ALTASCAD 201 (CanLII), 89 DLR (3d) 343 (ABCA) [Penner]. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mitchell v Reykdal, 2021 ABQB 301 (CanLII) [214] The framework for assessing whether a person is an AP is the AIRA itself (see e.g. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:58 am by Susan Brenner
If you want to read more about the application of the Katz standard, check out this post. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:32 am
TV Tonight reports on the Nine Network's appeal against the Federal Court's decision in Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v Ice TV Pty Ltd:The Nine Network is to appeal against a copyright ruling last year against ICE-TV. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
  He cites the Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm by Josh Blackman
Also check out Kevin Walsh's article on severability and Jon Mitchell's classic, The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy. [read post]