Search for: "Chick v. Chick" Results 61 - 80 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 9:08 am by Bill Otis
The Supreme Court today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:48 am by Brett McDonnell
One of my favorite examples of this is one of the classic old CSR cases, Medical Committee for Human Rights v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
O’Rourke, Nadine Strossen, and others) in trademark registration case of Iancu v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:04 pm by Ron Coleman
 In fact the long-awaited appeal from the District Court decision in a predecessor to this case, Naffe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Montgomery: indirect experience v. direct. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:10 am by Eugene Volokh
" I think this is likely unconstitutional, just as I think the same about San Antonio's exclusion of Chick-Fil-A from the San Antonio airport based on Chick-Fil-A's donations to groups that opposed homosexuality. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm by structuredsettlements
     SSP Holy Warrior chicks This author believes they bear some of the characteristics of cluckers, but will default to gobblers if they stay silent until Thanksgiving. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Some related links: the resolution; the 1996 Board of County Commissioners v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chick Fil A; fictional tarnishing brand, Chicks Fill A gentleman’s club. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:05 am by Todd Janzen
The suit, titled Haff Poultry, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
Ownership:TTAB Decides Priority Dispute in ZORLAC Skateboard ClashTTAB Refuses to Cancel ATL'S BADDEST CHICKS Registration: Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or FraudProcedural issues:TTAB Issues Pre-Trial Order in New REDSKINS Cancellation BattleRejecting Opposer's CD-ROM Testimony, TTAB Dismisses SWATCH Opposition to SWAP for Watch BandsPrecedential No. 5: Prompt Supplementation of Expert Disclosure Defeats Motion to Exclude Testimony, Says TTABTTAB Refuses to Cancel… [read post]