Search for: "Christiansen and Christiansen"
Results 61 - 80
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
The district court in Christiansen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:31 am
Moreover, the Second Circuit was likely to provide guidance on its position shortly in the case of Christiansen v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:05 pm
Christiansen. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 3:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Christiansen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:28 am
The other big sexual orientation/Title VII case — Christiansen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:26 am
Christiansen; here’s the introduction, which summarizes the thesis well: When scholars talk about originalism — and they do a lot of talking — they are almost always really talking about federal originalism. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
Christiansen has posted Originalism: The Primary Canon of State Constitutional Interpretation, which is forthcoming in the Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy:Given the reach of federal constitutional law and the attention the topic garners in law reviews, law schools, and general popular discourse, a certain degree of federal-centricity is understandable in most scholarly discourse about originalism. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 3:37 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in the case of Christiansen v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
The Second Circuit will have the chance to depart from its own precedent, when it decides Christiansen v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
The Second Circuit will have the chance to depart from its own precedent, when it decides Christiansen v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:03 am
Conserve Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2329); Christiansen, No. 13-00297 (N.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
According to Chris Geidner at Buzzfeed.com (here), 128 members of Congress filed a brief in Christiansen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
According to Chris Geidner at Buzzfeed.com (here), 128 members of Congress filed a brief in Christiansen v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 5:15 am
San Francisco – House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi today released the following statement on a bicameral amicus brief of 105 Members of Congress and 23 Senators in the case of Christiansen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
” Just days before the Fabian decision, however, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Christiansen v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:15 pm
Christiansen v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:10 am
” At the Stanford Review Online, Matthew Christiansen looks back at the Court’s recent decision in FERC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
We don’t like Christiansen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:54 am
Christiansen the $11,000,000.00 the jury decided she should be paid. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:18 am
The drawings his supervisor allegedly posted on a white board to ridicule him for being gay characterized him as overly masculine, with large muscles, so he could not claim he was stereotyped as being effeminate, and thus he could not rely on a sex stereotyping discrimination theory (Christiansen v. [read post]
