Search for: "Citibank v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Attorney General United States, No. 19-1404 (3d Cir. 2020) Related posts: Fourth Circuit Rejects Anti-Spam Lawsuit–Omega World Travel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Yishai Schwartz
Doctrinally, Bank Markazi’s argument was based on a 19th Century precedent, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:28 am
A later decision in 1996 (Smiley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
Preemption is a big deal: The feds have tried to preempt state regulation of financial markets, as in Watters v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The “agreement” at the core of an account stated is independent of the underlying obligation between the parties (see Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d at 1056; Citibank [S.D.] [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm by Timothy Powers O'Neill
Zebra Investments, LC, 285 F.3d 954, 959 (11th Cir. 2002);Veale v Citibank, FSB, 85 F.3d 577, 580 (11th Cir. 1996); Nussbaum v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 5:47 am by Wystan Ackerman
This case was originally filed in North Carolina state court as a debt collection suit by Citibank against the plaintiff, George W. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm by MOTP
Bashaw v Republic State Mortgage Co, No 01-14-00427-CV (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm by Adam Levitin
Citibank (OCC preemption for late fees) AT&T v. [read post]