Search for: "Citizens v. Board of Elections" Results 61 - 80 of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Beth Stephens
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:01 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Expenditures during election cycles, while perhaps bad for the country, would often be good for profit maximization. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am by Matthew Scarola
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 11:57 am by Fei-Lu Qian
In wake of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:38 pm by Richard Pildes
I filed an amicus brief in the 2006 case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
The conservative majority of the Court hardly gave Republicans a gift, assuming these ratios continue when the rules are liberalized across the board, and we have no reason to believe they won’t be. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm by NARF
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief: Muscogee Nation citizen Lauren J. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:30 am by Socrates & Cassandra
Recently, the Supreme Court acting in its legislative capacity voted on January 21, 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Betsy McKenzie
The recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
The lawsuit does not involve provisional ballots, signature matches or counting delays—logistical aspects of modern elections that are increasingly subject to legal dispute—but instead attacks the basic substantive rules that Maine law uses to determine who wins Congressional elections.The crux of the legal challenge is the permissibility of Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting system, which the state’s voters adopted via a citizen initiative in 2016 and reaffirmed… [read post]