Search for: "Clayton et al v. Does"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
In answer to my own not so jocular question in the title, the answer is, I truely don't know..So the long awaited decision in Newzbin 2 aka Twentieth Century Fox et al v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) is out. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Clayton County, 140 S. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Sonotone Corp. et al. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
Mergers and acquisitions are regulated under the Clayton Act, which states: "No person shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or any other share capital... of the assets of one or more persons engaged in commerce or in any activity affecting commerce, where... the effect of such acquisition, of such stocks or assets, or of the use of suck stock by the voting or granting of proxies or otherwise, may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
§2-302 does not even contain a definition or a standard to determine whether the terms of a contract are in fact unconscionable.[4] In attempting to provide a workable standard, paragraph (3) of the FPGPA looks to whether the amount charged: (i) grossly exceeds the average price at which the gasoline was offered for sale during the 30 days prior to such proclamation; (ii) grossly exceeds the price at which gasoline was readily obtainable in the same area from other competing… [read post]
