Search for: "Cocking v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
The president of the United States has awesome power — quite literally, the power to blow us all to smithereens. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:05 pm
Com. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
_trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ca1.uscourts.gov');">Kim v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:58 am
He also brought state law claims. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
B&B v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:14 am
Lindon and others v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 3:51 am
Cocke v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm
In overruling this binding precedent, the Federal Circuit relied on the June 19, 2017 decision in Matal v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:25 am
You may contact a State Bar lawyer referral service. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
This legislation seems premature to me - a half-cocked, git-tuff response to a lingering social conflict between church and state. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
United Kingdom and Al-Skeini v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court of Canada stated the proper procedure in a case called R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court of Canada stated the proper procedure in a case called R. v. [read post]
