Search for: "Com. v. Cross, C."
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
It mainly focuses on cross border litigation which is considered to be closely related to the proper functioning of the Internal Market. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 1:38 pm
Hartigan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
Com. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 10:10 pm
” ¿Cómo se interpreta un Tratado? [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
(Porter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
& Com. 127-144 (2010). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
An unnamed EU Commission person made the sign of the cross and quoted liberally from the EC’s Safer Social Networking principles. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Okla. 1983), held that the "Miss Gay America Pageant"—a slightly misleading title for a cross-dressing pageant, in which men (whether or not gay) competed in female impersonation, id. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Kemp and Dan C. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:00 am
This marks the end of a revision process which started with the Commission proposal of 12 December 2012 (COM/2012/744 final). [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:00 am
Cir. 2005) (en banc) ("[C]laims must be read in view of the specification, of which they are a part. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
Cross-over hybridity: one of the most interesting provisions of the Report's recommendations was the suggestion that the World Bank adopt human rights due diligence reporting. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary are as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Second, some doubts arose regarding an ipso iure revival of the original Brussels Convention of 1968,[18] the international treaty concluded on the occasion of EU membership and later replaced by the Brussels I Regulation when the EU acquired the respective competence under the Treaty of Amsterdam.[19] Notwithstanding the interesting jurisprudential debate, these speculations were effectively put to a halt in legal practice by a clarifying letter of the UK Mission to the European… [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
The test adopted by the Delaware courts [See, e.g., Tooley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
