Search for: "Cook v. Bright"
Results 61 - 75
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am
Wahlquist, Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Kennedy disagreed with the plurality’s interpretation of the CWA and instead followed the Court’s 2001 holding in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Makeig v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
The author, a 2011 law graduate, got the bright idea of trying to analyze empirically a phenomenon that we’ve simply accepted – that we’ve referred to on more than one occasion as “strange things happen in tort preemption cases. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 8:03 am
., LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Here is somelanguage from the decision, North Carolina v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Tim Cook’s Response to the Judge’s Order. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:55 pm
Specifically, the Revised Final Rule does the following: (i) reaffirms the “work-availability” requirement; (ii) reaffirms employer consent for taking FFCRA leave intermittently; (iii) revises the definition of “healthcare provider”; (iv) clarifies that employees must provide required documentation supporting their need for FFCRA leave to their employers as soon as practicable; and (v) corrects an inconsistency regarding when employees may be required to provide… [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
(Bridgewater, MA) Bright Horizons Capital Corp. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
