Search for: "Cook v. Bright" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm by Scott Birkey
Rapanos and other Court decisions, most notably Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 10:41 am by Schachtman
  Perhaps the Respondents were using the “cooking frogs” approach. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Monika U. Ehrman
Kennedy disagreed with the plurality’s interpretation of the CWA and instead followed the Court’s 2001 holding in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
The author, a 2011 law graduate, got the bright idea of trying to analyze empirically a phenomenon that we’ve simply accepted – that we’ve referred to on more than one occasion as “strange things happen in tort preemption cases. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Here is somelanguage from the decision, North Carolina v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:55 pm by Eric Raphan and Jamie Moelis*
Specifically, the Revised Final Rule does the following: (i) reaffirms the “work-availability” requirement; (ii) reaffirms employer consent for taking FFCRA leave intermittently; (iii) revises the definition of “healthcare provider”; (iv) clarifies that employees must provide required documentation supporting their need for FFCRA leave to their employers as soon as practicable; and (v) corrects an inconsistency regarding when employees may be required to provide… [read post]