Search for: "Cooper Hotel Services, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court held that the USPTO failed to offer any evidence showing that “booking.com” is used to refer generically to online hotel reservation services. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:07 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
  A popular hotel in Mogadishu, Somalia was attacked by Islamist militants. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:21 am by Roger Parloff
Unambiguously asserting executive privilege over those communications would tend to admit that the people at the Willard Hotel were ac [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
 (IP tango)   Global - Patents Valuing patents – interesting discussion (Duncan Bucknell Company) IP Owners Education foundation 5th International Judges Conference: Gurry calls for more cooperation over PCT (Managing Intellectual Property) A response to PWC’s ‘starry-eyed’ view of the value of litigation as effective way to monetise patents (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Are patents a hindrance to low-carbon technology? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm by jgabryno
Gulliver, of Reynolds Smith and Hills, Inc., gave a presentation titled, “Can Your Airport Become a Spaceport? [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for HMMRC, heard 29- 30 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Bradley Cooper who pushed the button? [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm by Jennifer Barna
EO 157 further states that while the following recreational and entertainment businesses may open their outdoor spaces to the public, they may not open their indoor spaces to the public (except to enter or exit the establishment, or to use the restroom): “Health clubs,” as defined by J.S.A. 56:8-39, which include gyms and fitness centers, as well as any health club facilities located in hotels, motels, condominiums, cooperatives, corporate offices, or other business… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   However, the risk of enforcement is particularly acute for businesses in the following industries, designed for heightened enforcement and other attention as “Low Wage High Violation Industries” based on their particularly high record of noncompliance:  Agriculture, Amusement, Apparel Manufacturing, Auto Repair, Child Care Services, Construction, Food Services, Guard Services, Hair, Nail & Skin Care Services, Health Care,… [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 7:31 am by Steven Boutwell
Influencers have been used by industries including hotels and travel services, fitness, cosmetics, clothing and accessories, food and beverage, restaurants, dietary supplements, and a litany of other consumer products and services. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The suit also asserts that the company unlawfully retaliated against several workers by firing them after they cooperated with the federal investigation. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Hilton Hotels Corp., 1993 WL 210866, at *3, 995 F.2d 305 (D.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]