Search for: "Cooper v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 4:54 am
Ohio Sept. 27, 2012); Cooper v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm
Cooper, 140 S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:18 am
A 1998 trial court decision in A&A Properties NY Ltd. v Soundings Condominium broke new ground by granting the unit holder’s application to inspect the list. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
Holder, 565 U.S. 302, 132 S. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
Holder, 129 S. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Public and private cooperation necessary to fight cybercrime http://t.co/eh0yDrilSt -> Canada set to begin Patent Prosecution Highway pilot program with EU http://t.co/4zsj2n5FNl -> Key Aspects of the New Reform of the Spanish Copyright Act http://t.co/jR6SSfUbXB -> iiNet and Dallas Buyers Club set for February courtroom showdown http://t.co/gExMj06d8L -> CJEU asked to rule on copyright liability of operators of free and open Wi-Fi networks http://t.co/BluScg5Pyq -> Court… [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Both of these problems are highly relevant to the closely watched FTC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
Cooper, 99 N.J. 42 (1984) and Holder v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
The SEC applied the classic three-prong test enunciated in SEC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:09 am
In Pandora Media, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:27 pm
Walker, Jr. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
For instance, in its recent Discussion Paper on Online Copyright Infringement, the Australian Government wrote that "Australia is obliged under its free trade agreements with the United States, Singapore and Korea (not yet ratified) to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
Gilman asserted that in doing so, `neither [he] nor any other privilege holder waives any applicable privilege(s). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm
From Hardaway v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Holder, 2011 U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
Cooper, Federal Practiceand Procedure § 4409 (2d ed. 2002). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:18 am
Instead, he rejects the application because the target of the search was cooperating with the government and had consented to the search. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Finley, which challenged political content restriction on NEA funding; and Holder v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke… [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
Classes of accommodation, reserved seats and sleeping berths Except with permission from an authorised person, no person shall remain in any seat, berth or any part of a train where a notice indicates that it is reserved for a specified ticket holder or holders of tickets of a specific class, except the holder of a valid ticket entitling him to be in that particular place. [read post]
