Search for: "DAVID v STATE FUND"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
The following contribution to our same-sex marriage symposium is by David B. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
David B. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:14 am
David S. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:01 pm
Hoffman, The promises and perils of international institutional bypasses: defining a new concept and its policy implications for global governance Victor V. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
John Fund, Inc., 573 U.S. 258, 266 (2014). [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
For publication opinions today (3): David Michael Green v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
In his affidavit, Staley stated that Midland Funding did not appear at trial because neither he nor his office received the trial court's change of venue notice or a trial notice. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
In his affidavit, Staley stated that Midland Funding did not appear at trial because neither he nor his office received the trial court's change of venue notice or a trial notice. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:27 pm
The settlement resolves a federal lawsuit, David Oster et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm
State of California (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)Longo v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:06 pm
Campbell cites Ramey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
Ars Technica and Wired.com report that Oklahoma State University, after receiving the order to show cause in Arista v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
David MarcusSince the 1970s, conservatives have vastly outspent and out-organized progressives in their efforts to control state-level politics. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 5:55 pm
In Carmichael v. [read post]
