Search for: "DOES, 3 through 10" Results 61 - 80 of 22,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
”[3] And no statistics show how many of those who are physically assaulted are also victims of coercive control. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:45 pm by Allan Blutstein
 How does OGIS’s compliance work? [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:20 am by Sherri Johnson
  If that does not work, then you may be able to seek relief through the VAB process. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 12:01 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
In that case the performance artist and the photographer are co-authors, Paris Court of Appeals, 4th Chamber B, December 3, 2004. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:24 am
Fysh slips through net of design right claimsBailey and Bailey v Haynes and Haynes, a Patents County Court decision of Judge Michael Fysh QC from 2 October, has been summarised on the Sweet & Maxwell Lawtel subscription service. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Debtors usually need a car[3] to travel to and from work, school, medical appointments, and other important activities. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Given that the committee does not meet in the summer, an election call in the fall would kill Bill C-10. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
The plain truth is that a corporation does not suffer any injury from short swing profits realized by a 10% shareholder and hence does not have standing to bring a Section 16(b) lawsuit against that shareholder. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Ninth Circuit’s additional due diligence requirement appears contrary to the text of Rule 60(b)(3), which does not mention diligence.10 The parties cite no cases from other courts of appeals adopting this additional requirement, nor are we aware of any other courts of appeals that have adopted it.11 (...) [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:29 am by Ray Mullman
Even though you do lose about 10 percent of body heat through your head, it is not the main exit. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 7:05 pm by Cordisco & Saile Web Team
A complaint may be made to a judge for a violation of R.S.39:3-12, R.S. 39:3-34, R.S.39:3-37, R.S.39:4-129 or R.S.39:10-24 at any time within one year after the commission of the offense; for a violation of R.S.39:4-50, section 2 of P.L.1981, c. 512 (C.39:4-50.4a), section 5 of P.L.1990, c. 103 (C.39:3-10.13), section 16 of P.L.1990, c. 103 (C.39:3-10.24), section 3 of P.L.1952, c. 157 (C.12:7-46), or section 9 of P. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:58 pm by Doug Cornelius
Fund of funds have special rules under 4.13(a)(3) with a look through to the underlying funds. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm by David M. McLain
As previously reported, HB 10-1394 was introduced into the Colorado House of Representatives on April 1, 2010. [read post]