Search for: "DOES 1-100, exclusive"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am
In particular, the Commission noted that ETSI's IPR policy does not prohibit patent owners from seeking injunctive relief, and that several attempts to add such language have failed. [...] [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am
McDowell, 794 F.2d 100, 110 (3d Cir. 1986) (indicating that a trustee does not violate his duty if it is “prudent to refrain from bringing an action”) (citation omitted). [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
In footnote 1, the D.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:01 am
” Section 320.14(1)(b) criminalizes having equal to or more than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:33 am
For example, similar claims were brought against another payment processor (Heartland) after it disclosed a compromise that affected over 100 million cardholders. [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:00 am
The post Welcome to the Internet: What is a Domain Name and how does it work? [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The dilution ratio of between 2 to 1 and 10 to 1 of said liquid chocolate concentrate […] is not helpful either. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:27 pm
The Court relied on a 100 year old Supreme Court precedent as relevant authority in its holding. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:27 pm
The Court relied on a 100 year old Supreme Court precedent as relevant authority in its holding. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:02 am
Only the one unit where the owner lives can get the personal residence exclusion when you sell the building. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
The patent in suit had been opposed pursuant to Article 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty (Article 54 EPC) and lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC), Article 100(b) EPC for insufficiency of disclosure (Article 83 EPC), and Article 100(c) EPC for added matter (Article 123(2) EPC and Article 76(1) EPC).III. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
Indeed, plaintiffs cited to third party findings (including from the FCC) that the average cable subscriber is forced to pay for 85 channels that he does not watch to obtain the 16 he does, and that defendants' bundling results in a net consumer welfare loss of $100 million. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 1:32 pm
The husband had a pension that he testified would pay him $257.22 monthly if he retired July 1, 2020. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:00 am
Provisions of this law state that employers are now required to pay a 100% subsidy of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) continuation coverage premiums for certain people during the period of April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:42 am
Here’s the new rule: Effective December 1, 2021 (and annually through December 1, 2024), any employer in Connecticut with 100 or more employees must notify any Connecticut residents about whether such employer offers to employees an “education assistance program” under federal law. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:42 am
Here’s the new rule: Effective December 1, 2021 (and annually through December 1, 2024), any employer in Connecticut with 100 or more employees must notify any Connecticut residents about whether such employer offers to employees an “education assistance program” under federal law. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
If he was under a .150 then he is merely facing 1 day in jail. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Quander, 370 F.Supp.2d 79, 99-100 (D.D.C. 2005). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:42 am
” An exception to the exclusion stated: “However, this exclusion does not apply to liability for damages that the insured would have in absence of such state or federal act. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:17 am
Under the bill, these are people with taxable income of at least $1 million. [read post]
