Search for: "DOES 1-245"
Results 61 - 80
of 694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
That decision does not support Ms. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:12 am
Bacon, 245 Va. 107, 111 (1993)). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:12 am
Bacon, 245 Va. 107, 111 (1993)). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
During 240 days, there is no INA 245(c) bar to adjustment of status. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:15 pm
Question #1 – H-1B Nonimmigrant Work Visa Does the time on my H-1B visa start the day that is approved or when I first enter the U.S. using it? [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:22 pm
However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:30 am
The examiner then approved the claims as amended, noting that “[w]ith the cancellation of the claims which required . . . elution test scores [of] 1 or 2, [he] now agree[d] with the [district] court’s definition of the term biocompatible. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:00 am
At his juvenile trial, the judge found the evidence was sufficient and upheld the charge of 245(a)(1) - Assault with a deadly weapon. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:58 pm
Fortunately, as any criminal lawyer knows, the Penal Law does not allow for such untenable situations where no matter the knife or blade, possession would always constitute a misdemeanor or “more equal” felony offense. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:52 am
In an October 2022 Court of Appeals case , the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (Washtech) similary argued that the F-1 STEM Optional Practical Training (OPT) rule should be struck down on the ground that INA § 101(a)(15)(F)(i) authorizes DHS to allow F-1 students to remain in the U.S. only until they have completed their course of study and does not specifically authorize post-graduation practical training. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:14 am
During 240 days, there is no INA 245(c) bar to adjustment of status. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Defendants note that RIME’s signature does not appear·anywhere on the “Vandal Eyes”mural. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
. 'With regard to the conditions that the disclaimer meets the requirements of clarity and conciseness and does not remove more than necessary to restore novelty, both explicitly indicated in G 1/03 (see headnote, points 2.2 and 2.4), the Board concurs with the positions expressed in T 2130/11, points 2.9 and 2.10*. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 6:49 am
Preserving the pendency of an adjustment of status application in this manner does not apply to H-1/ H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants who are under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
Doe, 85 Misc.2d 592 (Utica City Court 1976) (who doesn't like citing a Utica City court case from 1976 as legal precedent!!!??). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
Amalfi, 35 F.4th 245 (4th Cir. 2022).] [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:52 pm
Falk, 463 S.W.2d 245, 252 (Tex. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
S. 245 (1928). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Article 113(1) EPC is infringed if the Board does not address submissions that, in its view, are relevant for the decision in a manner adequate to show that the parties were heard on them, i.e. that the Board substantively considered those submissions. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:17 pm
Sheridan, 192 A.D.2d 1057, 596 N.Y.S.2d 245 (4th Dept. 1993)) nor do they have to read them their Miranda Warnings prior to requesting they perform the tests. [read post]
