Search for: "David v. King" Results 61 - 80 of 872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
Following an interview with David King, the Chairman of Rangers FC, on Sky Sports and an accompanying article on the Sky website, Sports Direct International sought to commit Rangers FC and Mr King for contempt on the basis that the information in the interview and/or the article breached the terms of of the injunction. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:34 pm
The judges on the panel were David Steiner, Darrell Phillipson, and Mark Chow. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:34 am by David Pocklington
Country Life: What it’s like to have a prime seat at a Royal Coronation by John Betjeman, who reported for Country Life in 1953. (28 April 2023) YouTube: Collection of Vivats, Parry: ‘I Was Glad’ Collection of ‘Vivats’: Kings Edward VII, George V, George VI, Queen Elizabeth Ⅱ Russell Dewhurst: The King and the Law of the Church of England, ]2023], 25, (2)139 – 155. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am by pfriedman
Here’s a breathtakingly broad decision: The Indiana Supreme Court, in Barnes v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by pgbarnes
David Kotz has come under increasing fire from within the agency for allegedly instilling a climate of fear among employees in the organization. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Perhaps it would have been more like King Kong meets Lenin in October. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am by Amy Howe
  One of the most highly anticipated cases still outstanding is King v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
David Lopez, I bring you the EEOC’s important Amicus Brief filed in Burrows v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:03 pm by Paul Caron
This issue's prompt is by David Gamage (UC-Berkeley): Once again, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
"We are heirs to a tradition given voice 800 years ago by Magna Carta, which, on the barons' insistence, confined executive power by 'the law of the land,' " Justice David Souter declared in his concurring opinion in the landmark 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]