Search for: "Davidoff v Davidoff"
Results 61 - 80
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 5:35 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
In short, Coty was the exclusive licensee for the Community trade mark DAVIDOFF HOT WATER for perfumery. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch) is a 1 December ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in which some of the best legal brains in that jurisdiction had to give some cogent thought to the meaning of the common-or-garden word "consents". [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
Dervan at the White Collar Crime Prof blog, focusing on the Delaware Supreme Court opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:18 am
On May 22, 2014, the Delaware Corporate Law Council proposed an amendment to the DCGL that according to the amendment’s synopsis is “intended to limit the applicability of [the Delaware Supreme Court decision in ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
Davidoff (The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law) Kristin N. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:04 am
Davidoff & Christina M. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:29 pm
[Guth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:41 am
Is it necessary to apply the judgment in Joined Cases C-414/99 to C-416/99 [Zino Davidoff and Levi Strauss v Tesco and others] generally to all cases where it is being assessed whether a trade mark proprietor agreed to conduct which may result in weakening or limitation of his exclusive rights? [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
Richard observes that these comments are made all the more relevant by the recent Kat-rant over the pathetically short time available for consultation in Actavis v Sanofi, a reference to the CJEU in which, this Kat believes, a good case could be made out for a more generous time allowance given the political and economic significance of the case's outcome. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
Jersey Media Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:02 pm
Clarke PART V: NEW THEORY 22. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
The Second Circuit has not yet spoken directly on this question, though it has suggested that the presumption may still have some force in trademark cases; see Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
The Second Circuit has not yet spoken directly on this question, though it has suggested that the presumption may still have some force in trademark cases; see Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:14 am
This initial litigation led to a multiplicity of suits, now including the legal malpractice case Haberman v Xander Corp. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Cook, Frank Davidoff, “Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence,” 126 Ann. [read post]
