Search for: "Davis v. American Acceptance Corp."
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2013, 8:48 am
Davis Law Rev. 101 (2013) [“Revolution”]. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The motion, tabled by David Davis MP, calls for an “end [to] this serious attack on free speech by withdrawing the proceedings for contempt; further asserts the fundamental right of hon. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
Dun & Bradstreet Corp., 482 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2007). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
In case you want to reach Nick Alden or Dennis Moore, the two lawyers in this case, here’s their contact information: Nick Alden, Attorney at Law 1380 Davies Dr. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Fluor Daniel Corp., 222 F. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Attorney’s fees expended in litigation or dispute resolution are contrary to the American Rule and as such contractual language awarding attorney’s fees are strictly construed. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Because even if the Grouper wanted to manipulate the composition of the limited en banc panels by enhancing the probability of minority views on the panel,[19] the Grouper could effectively do no better than what is currently accepted. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
“The slickest way in the world to lie is to tell the right amount of truth at the right time-and then shut up. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Do we accept the pronouncements of the American Heart Association or those of the American College of Cardiology. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
IV avers as follows: The complaint goes on to state that I can’t help but think that these are the points that IV founder Peter Detkin should have made when he was featured in NPR’s This American Life’s episode entitled When Patents Attack. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
