Search for: "Dickinson v. Judges of District Court of Appeal" Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Judge Newman also concluded that the district court improperly shifted the burden of proof to the copyright holder. = = = Parties: DALE M. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Becton Dickinson and Tivo v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
: District court judges complain about claim construction because of the high likelihood that their decisions will be reversed on appeal. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:30 am
It is important to note that although the Court of Appeals vacated the injunction, the issues regarding Salinger's likelihood of success for the substantive issues remained in his favor.Patent's inequitable conduct to get a rehearing: Last week the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted an en banc rehearing of the appeal of a Californian district court decision in Therasense, Inc v Becton… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Beckton, Dickinson and Company, No. 21-819. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Cause number 2005-17972 was originally filed in the 113th District Court, HarrisCounty, Texas, but was transferred to the 61st District Court, Harris County, Texas.The same trial court that had dismissed appellants’ suit for want of prosecution, the 61st District Court, held a hearing on appellants’ application for vacatur. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
District Court for the District of New Hampshire), who was impeached for drinking on the job. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm by Gene Quinn
On appeal, Avid argued that the district court’s finding of materiality was clearly erroneous because Dr. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Id. at *7.ANDZipher also appeals the district court’s construction that the claims require “some method of deriving a tension measurement,” Markem, 2008 WL 4116666, at *12. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
The district court held that limitation invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]