Search for: "District of Columbia v. Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
District Court for the District of Columbia in an effort to enjoin the use of proxy voting. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Scott Bomboy
The addition of electoral votes for the District of Columbia because of the 23rd Amendment made the electoral college total an equally divisible number: 538 electors. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Consider only the fact that in the 2016 election, the 39 million people of California—roughly two million more than live in the twenty-one smallest state, plus the District of Columbia, combined, received only 55 electoral votes, while the 21 states plus D.C. got a total of 95. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:19 am by William Ford
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed House Republicans’ lawsuit seeking to enjoin the use of the House of Representatives’s proxy voting system. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford, Margaret Taylor
District Court for the District of Columbia for a hearing on House Republicans’ effort to enjoin the use of the proxy voting system developed to help the chamber conduct business more safely in the midst of the pandemic. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux
In 1867, President Andrew Johnson vetoed a bill granting adult citizens of the District — including Black men — the right to vote. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
They closed up Wall Street—the financial district of the world, and they had total domination. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
Structural Surveillance, Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, American University Washington College of Law; University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
”) CEI and NR argued that the claims should be dismissed under the District of Columbia’s Anti-SLAPP Act, a law intended to provide legal protection for statements involving matters of public concern. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Facial Recognition and the Fourth Amendment, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]