Search for: "Do No Harm v. Pfizer Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2000 WL 1099884, at *2 & n.1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 990 A.2d 17, 21 n.1 (Pa.Super. 2010) (rejecting fraud claim concerning promotion “for off-label uses for which the effectiveness had not been scientifically demonstrated”). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 381 F. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am
In Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let me know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
" Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
Let's turn now to how pseudonymity may be concretely harmful, and how open disclosure of party names may be valuable. [2.] [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Ass’n of the U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Ass’n of the U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
By adopting a more nuanced analysis, the Second Edition deprived defense counsel of a readily citable source for the proposition that low relative risks do not support inferences of specific causation. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Pfizer Inc., No. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Alpharma USPD, Inc., 887 So.2d 881, 883 (Ala. 2004)) (emphasis added).That’s four.Finally, in Overton v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
It's what we hope all our clients do anyway. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
In addition, these items often harm a vulnerable patient population. [read post]
