Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 61 - 80
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2013, 4:28 am
Ever since the Supreme Court invalidated the Defense of Marriage Act in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:31 pm
The January 13, 2020 decision in Hager v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:38 am
Specialists v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:38 am
Specialists v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The New York State Division of Human Rights [Division], after a hearing, found that the Town [Employer] had unlawfully discriminated against the Complainant on the basis of her disability. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The New York State Division of Human Rights [Division], after a hearing, found that the Town [Employer] had unlawfully discriminated against the Complainant on the basis of her disability. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:09 pm
In Gallagher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The ALJ found that the record supported the employee's claim that her supervisor had approved her request for leave without pay and that that leave was supported by a valid doctor's note.In contrast, Judge Zorgniotti found that the employer did prove the charges with respect to the second week of the employee's absence. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The ALJ found that the record supported the employee's claim that her supervisor had approved her request for leave without pay and that that leave was supported by a valid doctor's note.In contrast, Judge Zorgniotti found that the employer did prove the charges with respect to the second week of the employee's absence. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The ALJ found that the record supported the employee's claim that her supervisor had approved her request for leave without pay and that that leave was supported by a valid doctor's note.In contrast, Judge Zorgniotti found that the employer did prove the charges with respect to the second week of the employee's absence. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:18 am
(See Prewitt v Walgreens Order). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:42 pm
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
In Fore v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 9:21 am
The case, Mosby-Meachem v Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, involved an in-house attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:25 am
To view the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Colantonio v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:22 pm
FWC Division of Law Enforcement/Risk, OJCC 13-004928WWA, Judge Anderson held that where the Claimant refused to sign the agreement to resign and not to reapply for employment with the Employer that her case was controlled by Calderon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
In Grande v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
AB 2535 comes on the heels of the recent federal decision, Garnett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel when qualifying an applicant for employmentMatter of City of New York v New York City Civ. [read post]
