Search for: "Doe et al v. Johnson et al" Results 61 - 80 of 446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 7:42 am by John McFarland
Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., et al., No. 15-0225, Denbury opinion, that Denbury had shown as a matter of law that its line would serve a “public use. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Christopher S. Jones
Dennis Mastro, et al., No. 10-15276 (“Momot”), the Ninth Circuit reversed the Nevada District Court, holding that, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, [www.abanet.org] VAN DE KAMP, JOHN, ET AL. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055, and other Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner explained "a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1(b) is fatally defective and must be denied. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055, and other Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner explained "a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1(b) is fatally defective and must be denied. [read post]