Search for: "Doe v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 61 - 80 of 874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On the other hand, counseling letters may not be used as a subterfuge for avoiding initiating formal disciplinary action against a tenured individual.The decisions of the Commissioner of Education in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, are instructive in this regard. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" ECSO did not dispute that Coles condition constituted a disability and Coles did not dispute that as a deputy sheriff assigned to the position of "inmate escort" at ECSO's correctional facility, her disability does not permit her to be assigned to duties involving direct inmate contact, i.e., duties that require uninterrupted vigilance and emergency response capability. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
 Chapter V does expressly apply to the Crown but [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by Ellie Ismaili, Olswang LLP
Background This case concerns the alleged maladministration of a GP’s practice in Northern Ireland and its implications on the correct interpretation of the powers of Northern Ireland’s Commissioner of Complaints. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:01 am by S2KM Limited
A taxpayer is "careless" if he or she does not exercise reasonable diligence to determine the correctness of a tax return position contrary to the rules or regulations. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Addressing the issue to timeliness, the Commissioner ruled Eskridge’s petition was timely, explaining that “[a]n unsuccessful attempt to litigate a dispute in court which does not result in a final determination on the merits may be accepted as an excuse for failing to file a timely appeal to the Commissioner, when the appeal is commenced within 30 days of receipt of the [court’s] determination. [read post]