Search for: "Doe v. Preferred Care Inc. et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
Quest Diagnostics Inc., et al., Civil File No. 05 Civ. 5393 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
Building Materials Corp. of America et al 2008, WL 5082993 (E.D. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) Survey results – Next PTO Director (Patently-O) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) submission to Special 301 Review (Intellectual Property Watch) (Ars Technica) Outline for today’s ABA-ALI presentation on IP ADR (The IP ADR Blog) US congressional, USPTO officials see Geneva policymaking up close (Intellectual Property Watch) US General – Decisions 9th Circuit limits the scope of in-term covenants not to compete: Comedy Club… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Didham, et al., “Suicide and Self-Harm Following Prescription of SSRIs and Other Antidepressants: Confounding By Indication,” 60 Br. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
ATT Mobility, et al. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
In Brennan et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
(Chairman Battista and Members Schaumber and Kirsanow participated.) *** ELC Electric, Inc. (25-CA-28270-1, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 17) Indianapolis, IN Sept. 28, 2006. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
Chancellor Chandler made it quite clear that Delaware law simply does not support this distinction. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
In one place, the authors indicate “care” is required, and that analysis for random error, confounding, bias “should be conducted”: “Although relative risk is a straightforward concept, care must be taken in interpreting it. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Until the board has obtained and understood this information, it cannot be said to have complied with its duty of care in endorsing or rejecting a proposed nominee or, in the case of a settlement, appointing a nominee to the board. [read post]
