Search for: "Doe v. Rose" Results 61 - 80 of 1,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP v Rose; 2010 NY Slip Op 33288(U); November 23, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County; Judge: Joan A. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
Even where the contributions highlight that formal deference to the executive’s interpretations of law is explicitly recognized as a doctrinal matter, they also show that this form of deference operates very differently than it does underChevron. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  A v Switzerland, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2018). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:01 pm by Sme
Amie Rose Colclazier (10th Cir., November 6, 2017) (affirming dismissal of implied employment contract and FMLA retaliation claims, but reversing dismissal of breach of contract and First Amendment claims)*Rael v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 4:51 pm
The court said the persons filing the contest—the executors named in the original will and removed by the codicil—had no legal standing.Rose v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
A conviction for driving while intoxicated was reversed in People v Rose (__AD3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 08412 [4th Dept 11/13/09]) where the stop was baed on what the officer's bleief that he had witnesses a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law,based on mistaken interpretation of the law. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
Holly Hollman is general counsel for the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, which submitted an amicus brief in support of the respondents in The American Legion v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:30 am by Angela Onwuachi-Willig
Capers does not disappoint with his recent chapter The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm by Donald Dinnie
An American court has confirmed that government shutdown orders did not constitute ‘direct physical loss’ that would trigger an indemnity under the commercial insurance held by a group of restaurants (in Rose’s 1 LLC et al v Erie Insurance Exchange). [read post]