Search for: "Doe v. United States Air Force et al" Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Earlier this week, Military Judge James Pohl, the presiding judge at the military commission case United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
 The Court of Appeal held that "only if no other possible construction is possible would a skilled man be forced to conclude that the patentee had claimed that which he knew was old" (Beloit Technologies Inc v Valmet Paper [1995] RPC 705 at 720). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:50 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
It has come to our attention that a legal colleague has authored a blog analogizing the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the Obama Administration’s health care legislation (“Obamacare”), National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
  If the jury does not hear the bases of the opinion, it cannot meaningfully evaluate the opinion. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by pgbarnes
The appeal came in the case of Derek Carder, et al v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   United States US Patent Reform Campaign against America Invents Act intensifies (Inventive Step) Will you be crushed like a bug? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
Had Google gotten their way, Viacom would have had to join forces with Premier League et al to file one appeal brief. [read post]