Search for: "Does 1019"
Results 61 - 80
of 232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 11:34 am
The employee sued, claiming he could not be removed from the position without a hearing (Mingo vs Pirnie, 55 NY2d 1019).The Court of Appeals rejected Mingo's argument, stating that Section 50.4 "requires no more than that the person be given a written statement of the reasons therefore and afforded an opportunity to make explanation and to submit facts in opposition to such disqualification". [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
With regards to the Plaintiff’s general agency complaints against unnamed agents and employees of the named Defendant, the court noted that, under current Pennsylvania appellate law, the failure to identify a Defendant’s agent by name, or the designation of those individuals as a unit, does not justify striking agency allegations in a Complaint. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:34 am
The employee sued, claiming he could not be removed from the position without a hearing (Mingo vs Pirnie, 55 NY2d 1019).The Court of Appeals rejected Mingo's argument, stating that Section 50.4 "requires no more than that the person be given a written statement of the reasons therefore and afforded an opportunity to make explanation and to submit facts in opposition to such disqualification". [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
The appellant lost in Ex parte WeinerKSR is mentioned:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methodsis likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Table Mountain Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1019–20 (9th Cir. 2007)." [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
Giraud, 258 Conn. 631, 632, 783 A.2d 1019 (2001). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm
App. 3d at 1019. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:18 am
” Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc, 371 Ill.App.3d 1019, 864 N.E.2d 927, 309 Ill.Dec. 686. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:00 am
Therefore, the conflict does not appear to be a very significant one. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:38 am
The statute of limitations does not bar the action, provided that the plaintiff actually had the capacity to sue prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations (see Vastola v Maer, 39 NY2d 1019, 1021; Van der Stegen v Neuss, Hesslein & Co., 270 NY 55, 62-63; cf. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:01 am
Their numbers were 10 and 19, and, as a result of these events, the 1019 Foundation was organized. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Corp. v ASG Consulting Corp., 4 Misc 3d 1019(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 50967[U], * 6, * 8 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2004]). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
., No. 2014-1019, -1242, -1243 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 7:14 pm
”);Qualcomm, 548 F.3d at 1019; A.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 8:42 am
Exitron Corp., 122 F.3d 1019 (Fed. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
S. 1019, 1024 (SCALIA, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
at 785–786, 390 N.Y.S.2d 393, 358 N.E.2d 1019. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Lords (2006) 138 CA4th 1019. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am
While quoting extensively from the petition, the Superior Court does a fair amount of grammatical editing. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Lords (2006) 138 CA4th 1019. [read post]
