Search for: "Douglas v. Department of Revenue"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
BLANSHINE and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellees. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Condominiums -- Registered agent -- No merit to argument that service of process on registered agent of corporation qualified to transact business in Florida must comply with hierarchical provisions of section 48.081(1)(a)-(d)VERABELLA FALLS CONDOMINIUM, ASSOCIATION, INC. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
There has been a constant battle between wealthy taxpayers who have endeavoured to avoid or minimise the taxes that they pay, on the one hand, and revenue authorities who are charged with ensuring that everybody meets their legal obligations in relation to tax, on the other. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:37 am
The TaxProf Blog [pointed out via Instapundit ] reports the decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Levy limits constrain overall revenue growth, though allow both rates and individual homeowners’ tax liability to change within this aggregate constraint. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
Last week, Justice Kornreich released her 32-page decision in Zelouf International Corp. v Zelouf, 2014 NY Slip Op 51462(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 6, 2014], fixing the fair value of the 25% stock interest at $2.2 million and awarding additional “damages” of another $2.2 million on the “quasi-derivative” claims for waste and self-dealing. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Douglas Melamed, Exclusive Dealing Agreements and Other Exclusionary Conduct&nda [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
I had not been keeping track of CityVision since it more or less departed Texas, but based on ProPublica’s look at it it seems to be a shadow of its former self and reported revenues have tumbled since 2016. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Development, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
Supreme Court found in Staub v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm
Here's an excerpt from the opinion, NRA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Michael, The Guardians of the New Internal Revenue Code, 25 Fla. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
See, e.g., Peterson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
This can lead to gaming the system: lawyers are encouraged to take longer on tasks than they otherwise might, and as time can be written off or clients refuse to pay, hours worked are not directly correlated to revenue. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
http://t.co/hwHBatI (Mathew Nelson) Providing eDiscovery Clients With Value – http://bit.ly/qBm8RG (Hubbard & Jenkins) Raising the eDiscovery Stakes for Unprepared Litigants – http://t.co/UU3DUNd (Chris Dale) Recreational Hacking: Second Horseman of the Tech Apocalypse – http://t.co/kkBIqEx (Douglas Wood) Star Trek Meets eDiscovery: Episode Five – Captain Kirk Learns About Sedona Principle Two - http://tinyurl.com/3oeuuqe (Ralph Losey) Server Virtualization… [read post]
