Search for: "Driscoll v. Driscoll"
Results 61 - 80
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 1:54 pm
” (Driscoll v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 1:58 pm
See Whitman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
Neither of his successors, Paddy Driscoll and Tom Stidham, came close to matching Murray’s success on the playing field, and in 1946, Murray was enthusiastically welcomed back to Marquette. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 3:34 am
Driscoll held that further factual development was needed to determine whether it was reasonable for the resigned manager’s fiduciary duty to extend beyond his resignation and, if so, for how long. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:13 am
O’Driscoll, 739 F.3d 108, 113 (2d Cir. 2014); West v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
On November 30, 2016, the California Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Driscoll v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
On November 30, 2016, the California Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Driscoll v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:20 pm
One thing I like about reading judicial opinions is that you often learn something new. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
” Sharon Driscoll interviews members of the Stanford Law School faculty about the Supreme Court and the election of Donald Trump for the law school’s Legal Aggregate blog. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:02 am
Walker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:19 am
The quoted words appear in an oral argument transcript in a case called Cardino v Feldman pending before Justice Driscoll involving a fight between 50-50 owners of a construction company operated by the defendant Feldman. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Pluard v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:13 pm
O’Driscoll, which established a “materiality test. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:13 pm
O’Driscoll, which established a “materiality test. [read post]
27 May 2016, 12:02 pm
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Motion to set sale aside as fraudulent This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Harford County ratifying the foreclosure sale of a Bel Air home formerly owned by appellant, Sandra S. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
Driscoll (Wash. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
Driscoll (Wash. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
