Search for: "E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS " Results 61 - 80 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Jurisdiction: GeoTag, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Patent Attorney Malpractice: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Patent Attorney Malpractice: Encyclopaedia Britannica v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
DuPont de Nemours & Company, No. 15-1499 (is proof of a “reasonable expectation of success” necessary to combine references in an obviousness case against a claimed combination invention) Laches: Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:40 am by Thomas Long
In addition, MacDermid’s Digital CST printing plates did not infringe another DuPont patent (E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:01 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
The plaintiff alleged that DuPont (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.), which sells products including Teflon, Stainmaster carpet, and Gore-tex, continuously dumped carcinogenic waste into the Ohio River, and the company tried to conceal the dangers of C-8. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:12 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The basic problem in In re M-I is that the trial judge never considered any countervailing interests that the plaintiff had in protecting the secrets during the court proceeding.It is a little curious that the Court in its Fourteenth Amendment analysis never cited E.I. duPont de Nemours Powder Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am by Schachtman
The Heart of the Matter The classic early cases in products liability law were about consumers hurt by consumer products, sold by manufacturers or dealers directly to consumers. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:38 am by Jim Higgins
DuPont de Nemours daily while working as a painter between 1973 and 1996 for Timpte Trailers, a manufacturer of semi-trailers. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:22 am by Amy Abeloff and Robert B. Milligan
DuPont de Nemours and Company and Corning, Incorporated, as well as an expert on trade secret law, and a professor specializing in trade secret academia. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:13 pm by Robert B. Milligan and Amy Abeloff
DuPont de Nemours and Co.; Tom Beall, VP and Chief IP Counsel at Corning Corp.; James Pooley, Principal at James Pooley, PLC; and Professor Sharon Sandeen, Hamline University School of Law. [read post]