Search for: "EDDINGS v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 13,509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm by Jason Rantanen
The Federal Circuit confirmed that “WesternGeco displac[ed] Power Integrations. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am by Dylan Gibbs
But the Alberta Court of Appeal cleared things up this week, saying the lower court decision “exceed[ed] the limits on the power of the judiciary to change the law. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
 Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives)  in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]