Search for: "EEOC v. Group Health Plan"
Results 61 - 80
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
It did so in response to a comprehensive study of health care needs and access in the United States, conducted by the non-partisan, Congressionally chartered group, the Institute of Medicine (IOM). [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:48 am
Thus, it remanded the rules to the EEOC for reconsideration without vacatur (AARP v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
Reproductive Health. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Likely in response to the California Supreme Court’s December 23, 2016 ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
Until these and other required actions are completed by the Agencies and the applicable plan sponsors, fiduciaries and other parties, employers and other plan sponsors, their management, their health plans, health plan fiduciaries, administrators and insurers remain legally obligated to continue to comply with the ACA as presently implemented under the existing regulations and judicial and administrative rulings. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
Per the court’s analysis in AARP v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:47 pm
AARP v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
Businesses & Their Leaders Face Rising FLSA Collective Action Liability Risks Improve HR Value To Company By Making HR A Performance Rather Than People Department Sponsoring Employers Face Excise Taxes, Other Liabilities Unless Health Plans Comply With ACA Out-Of-Pocket & Other Federal Rules Legal Review Of Health Plan Documents, Processes Needed To Mitigate Employer’s Excise Tax & Other Health Plan Risks EEOC ADA Suit… [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:31 am
It also noted that the EEOC has adopted this view as part of its Strategic Enforcement Plan and that the Seventh Circuit has agreed to a full rehearing of the issue in an on-point case. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
His November 16, 2016 final order in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:31 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
Manage Retaliation Risks In Response To Updated EEOC Enforcement Guidance, Rising Retaliation Claims
31 Aug 2016, 2:02 am
U.S. employers, employment agencies, unions, their benefit plans and fiduciaries, and their management and service providers should move quickly to review and strengthen their employment and other practices to guard against a foreseeable surge in employee retaliation claims and judgements likely to follow the August 30, 2016 issuance by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of its new final EEOC Enforcement Guidance on Retaliation and Related Issues… [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:03 pm
Broward County and EEOC v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:00 pm
Employers must comply with both sets of rules as of the first group health plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2017. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:58 am
Broward County and EEOC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
The employer in EEOC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm
For Help With Investigations, Policy Updates Or Other Needs Recognized as a “Top” attorney in employee benefits, labor and employment and health care law extensively involved in health and other employee benefit and human resources policy and program design and administration representation and advocacy throughout her career, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer is a practicing attorney and Manag [read post]
