Search for: "Ed Stephens" Results 61 - 80 of 2,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Reference Staff
Kim Wright.Ethical Standards in the Public Sector: A Guide for Government Lawyers, Clients, and Public Officials (3rd ed., 2022) edited by Jennifer G. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:08 pm by Mary Love and Devin Ricci
Case Summary The plaintiff, Stephen Thaler, used the “Creativity Machine,” a generative AI technology, to generate a piece of artwork. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am by Eric Goldman
” U.S. copyright law protects only works of human authorship, and the defendant, Stephen Thaler, expressly told the Copyright Office that the work at issue, titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” “lack[ed] traditional human authorship. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
.): Plaintiff Stephen Thaler owns a computer system he calls the "Creativity Machine," which he claims generated a piece of visual art of its own accord. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Alan Beck and Stephen Stamboulieh represent plaintiffs.The post Hawaii Butterfly Knife Ban Violates Second Amendment appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Bob Ambrogi
Instead, Smith’s slate removes Palace from his spot as a voting member of the council and names as chair New York lawyer Stephen P. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
Kas (eds.), Civil Courts and the European Polity. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
(Captain Copyright ~ 2006) For the second time in recent weeks, the Globe Mail – supposedly Canada’s “newspaper of record” - has published highly misleading and embarrassingly over the top op eds from authors who really should know better, given their notable backgrounds. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:22 am by Dan Bressler
Someone has to stand up for judicial independence and an institution that is part of the bedrock of our constitutional order.'” “Stephen Engelberg, ProPublica’s editor-in-chief, condemned the op-ed’s headline, ‘which the piece declared without anyone having read the article and without asking for our comment… We’re curious to know whether The Journal fact-checked the essay before publication,’ he told The New York Times. [read post]