Search for: "Elmer v. Elmer" Results 61 - 80 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:30 pm
The ruling came in EC Term of Years Trust v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
WHITTLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS COUNTY COMMISSIONER, RUFUS WARD, JR., ELMER CATON, JOSEF HAUSLER, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND THE COUNTY OF RED RIVER; from Red River County; 6th district (06-07-00058-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-18-08)08-0350 STEPHANIE DUKES, ET AL. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 10:04 am
  In a survey, 63 design patent infringement cases have been identified since Markman was first applied to a design patent claim in Elmer v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:54 am by Rob
Elmer’s Disposal Service, Inc. (9th Cir. 1975) 510 F.2d 84, 86 fn. 1. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 12:47 pm by José Guillermo
Elmer  Amadeo Palomino Vega, Mirtha Carola Anderson Higinio y otros, POR HABER INICIADO Y CONCLUIDO UN PROCESO FRAUDULENTO sin haberme citado ni oído QUE  DETERMINO la Salida de mi esposa MARÍA JESÚS HIGINIO RATTO del Hospital de Salud Mental San Juan Pablo II de la ciudad del Cusco a cuyo personal también he denunciado, SIN HABERSE RECUPERADO DEL MAL QUE LA AFECTA y que hoy se haya bajo responsabilidad de nuestra hija MIRTHA CAROLA ANDERSON HIGINIO… [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:24 pm
See, e.g., Brief of Amicus Curiae Apple, Inc., at 19 (citing, inter alia, Elmer v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:50 am
The question presented in EC Term of Years Trust v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir.), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 976 (1985) (determining from the evidence as a whole whether there was substantial evidence in support of the jury verdict); Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. [read post]