Search for: "Employment Division v. Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division denied a petition of an employee [Plaintiff] seeking to annul the appointing authority's [Employer] decision to terminate the employment of the Plaintiff before she completed her probationary period. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division denied a petition of an employee [Plaintiff] seeking to annul the appointing authority's [Employer] decision to terminate the employment of the Plaintiff before she completed her probationary period. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:21 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Supreme Court to revisit its holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:11 am
Div., 245 A.D.2d 647[Decided with Smith v Buffalo Board of Education]Often temporary teachers seek unemployment insurance benefits during a school district’s summer recess. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am by Jim Oleske
City of Philadelphia, a case in which the petitioners and several amici are asking the Court to either (1) overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am by Brett Holubeck
”  The Opinion indicates that there are at least five justices that would overturn Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Writing for the majority in the 1990 case of Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:33 am by Steve Shiffrin
The Court had previously determined in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Neither confusion concerning the administrative procedure nor an agency employee's incorrect information toll the running of the Statute of Limitations for filing an appeal Smith v Commissioner of Labor, 2012 NY Slip Op 05887, Appellate Division, Third Department An applicant for unemployment insurance benefits received two notices of rejecting his claim for benefits. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public employer may impose restraints on First Amendment activities of its employees that are job-related that would be unconstitutional if applied to the public at largeSanter v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]