Search for: "Employment Division v. Smith"
Results 61 - 80
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
For example, Section 510 would have authorized Attorney General Garland to assign supervision of the Mar-a-Lago investigation, and any subsequent prosecution, to an attorney employed in the Office of the Attorney General (OAG), or to an attorney in the Tax Division, or to an attorney in the Environment and Natural Resources Division, etc. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:11 am
Div., 245 A.D.2d 647[Decided with Smith v Buffalo Board of Education]Often temporary teachers seek unemployment insurance benefits during a school district’s summer recess. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm
Smith. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
City of Philadelphia, a case in which the petitioners and several amici are asking the Court to either (1) overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am
” The Opinion indicates that there are at least five justices that would overturn Employment Division v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
On August 29 Smith wrote the Division “seeking to withdraw and rescind” his resignation. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
On August 29 Smith wrote the Division “seeking to withdraw and rescind” his resignation. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:33 am
The Court had previously determined in Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Writing for the majority in the 1990 case of Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm
Inexplicably, this reading became orthodox, and in 1990, in Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 1:16 pm
For years the leading recalcitrant worker case was Smith v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm
Under Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Neither confusion concerning the administrative procedure nor an agency employee's incorrect information toll the running of the Statute of Limitations for filing an appeal Smith v Commissioner of Labor, 2012 NY Slip Op 05887, Appellate Division, Third Department An applicant for unemployment insurance benefits received two notices of rejecting his claim for benefits. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:03 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: Justice O’Connor’s recently released Supreme Court papers reveal the untold story of how the Court systematically dismantled religious accommodation protections in the decade leading up to Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
” Employment Division v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
A public employer may impose restraints on First Amendment activities of its employees that are job-related that would be unconstitutional if applied to the public at largeSanter v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Disqualifying an applicant for examination or for appoint to, or continued employment in, a position in the classified serviceSokol v New York City Civ. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Disqualifying an applicant for examination or for appoint to, or continued employment in, a position in the classified serviceSokol v New York City Civ. [read post]
